<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research on Teaching Reading Archives - Waldorf Research Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/category/research-on-teaching-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/category/research-on-teaching-reading/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 13:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Middle-schoolers’ reading and processing depth in response to digital and print media</title>
		<link>https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/middle-schoolers-reading-and-processing-depth-in-response-to-digital-and-print-media/</link>
					<comments>https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/middle-schoolers-reading-and-processing-depth-in-response-to-digital-and-print-media/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research on Teaching Reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/?p=1872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Old news is re-surfacing about reading comprehension and retention in reading online vs. reading on the printed page. In 2007 a research study reported a 50% drop in comprehension and retention in reading when on screen vs. on the printed page. That study disappeared for seventeen yers and now a new study proves the point [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure style="width: 2373px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1599689868384-59cb2b01bb21?q=80&amp;w=2373&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=crop&amp;ixlib=rb-4.0.3&amp;ixid=M3wxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHx8fA%3D%3D" width="2373" height="1577" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">https://unsplash.com/@mparzuchowski</figcaption></figure>
<p>Old news is re-surfacing about reading comprehension and retention in reading online vs. reading on the printed page. In 2007 a research study reported a 50% drop in comprehension and retention in reading when on screen vs. on the printed page. That study disappeared for seventeen yers and now a new study proves the point once more. Read about it here!<br />
<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.30.553693v1.full" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.30.553693v1.full</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.waldorfresearchinstitute.org/middle-schoolers-reading-and-processing-depth-in-response-to-digital-and-print-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
